Ex Parte Bailey
California Supreme Court
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus to W. K. Barretto, Marshal of the town of Santa Monica. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
At the time of the issuance of the writ, herein, the petitioner was in custody under a judgment pronounced upon his conviction of a violation of the provisions of an ordinance of the town of Santa Monica, adopted November 19, 1900. His claim was that the ordinance is void. His application was pending unsubmitted at the time of the fire-of April 18-20, 1906, and the record was destroyed. It is only within the last few weeks that the record has been restored,, and the matter submitted for decision.
The ordinance in question is as follows:
“Ordinance • 346. An ordinance regulating seining in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re RamerizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Nathanson v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Paladini v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- People v. Stafford Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.