Paladini v. Superior Court of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition against the Superior Court of the State of California, City and County of San Francisco, and Honorable George A. Sturtevant, Judge of said court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to prevent the carrying out of an order of the superior court requiring them to. produce before the respondent, Harris Weinstock, state market director, their ledger and sale account for the week February 20 to 28, 1918, and to prohibit the superior court from punishing petitioners for contempt of court in failing to comply with said order.
The respondent, Harris Weinstock, as state market director, is attempting to carry out the procedure provided in the law enacted by the legislature of this state in 1917 (Chap. 803, p. 1673, sec. 26), providing for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lanterman v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Ex parte FritzMississippi Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex Parte BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Hevren v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re PhoedoviusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- People v. Monterey Fish Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- In Re QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- California Gillnetters Ass'n v. Department of Fish & GameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.