Legal Opinion

Nathanson v. State

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1976No. 2541PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

Stephen Nathanson, a commercial fisherman residing in the Seldovia, Alaska, area, was convicted by a superior court jury of fishing for king crab before the 1974 season opened, a violation of AS 16.0S.920. Prior to trial Nathanson moved to suppress all evidence which was obtained by a search and seizure of his crab pots. The superior court denied Nathanson’s motion to suppress, and this appeal is based on the denial of that motion.

The facts disclose that a new regulation, 1 enacted just prior to the 1974 — 75 season, provided that fishermen could place their crab pots in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Palmer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Woods & Rohde, Inc. v. State, Department of LaborAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. MalkinAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MyersAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API