Legal Opinion

Holbert v. Noon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 8, 2011No. 091449; A142678Published

1Opinion of the Court

260 P.3d 836 (2011)

245 Or. App. 328

Jennifer Michelle HOLBERT, Petitioner-Respondent, and

Philip Mathew NOON, Sr., Respondent-Appellant.

091449; A142678.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted June 16, 2010.

Decided September 8, 2011.

Patrick L. Hadlock, Corvallis, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Ringo, Stuber, Ensor & Hadlock, P.C.

No appearance for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge, and CARSON, Senior Judge.

HASELTON, P.J.

Respondent in proceedings under the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) appeals, challenging the trial court's…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. GarciasOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Newell v. WestonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API