Legal Opinion
United States v. Wittig
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 31, 2006No. 03-40142-JARPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL AND NEW TRIAL
ROBINSON, District Judge.
At the close of the government’s evidence, defendants jointly moved for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 29(a) (Doc. 493); and at the close of the trial defendants orally moved for judgment of acquittal. This Court took the motions under advisement. Defendants Wittig and Lake subsequently filed a Joint Motion for Judgment of Acquittal (Doc. 541) on October 26, 2005. 1 Defendant Wittig filed a Motion for New Trial (Doc. 538); and defendant Lake filed a motion to join in…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WittigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- United States v. WittigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. KingDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2014