Legal Opinion

United States v. Lake

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 5, 2007No. 19-1364PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

The defendants, David C. Wittig and Douglas T. Lake, came to Kansas from Wall Street investment banks to run the state’s largest public utility, now known as Westar Energy, Inc. The government convinced the jury in this case that the two men had conducted a far-reaching scheme to milk the company for all they could through a pattern of fraud and deceit. But the prosecution hung by a thin legal thread. Despite the scope of the alleged fraudulent scheme, all the counts of the indictment depended on proving the ef forts of the defendants to conceal from the United States…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. GallantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Westar Energy, Inc. v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. RedcornCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API