Legal Opinion

United States v. Wittig

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 22, 2006No. 06-3166PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

HARRIS L. HARTZ, Circuit Judge.

This is David C. Wittig’s second appeal of his convictions on six charges arising out of a fraudulent bank transaction. On the first appeal we reversed his sentence because of errors in computing his offense level under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (USSG). See United States v. Weidner and Wittig, 437 F.3d 1023 (10th Cir.2006) (Wittig I). We remanded for resentencing, noting that the intervening Supreme Court decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), had held that the Guidelines are not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Paul C. "Paulie" VillanoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  4. United States v. CageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. WittigCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Terri PruittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. ChristyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
  5. United States v. WittigDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API