Legal Opinion

In re Bailey

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1915No. 3,620PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Proceedings in contempt against Wendell Bailey for practicing law within the state without a license. Respondent adjudged guilty. Cause submitted on briefs of counsel.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanner

On January 19, 1915, the attorney general of this state filed in this court an accusation charging one Wendell Bailey, of Sidney, Richland county, Montana, with a contempt of this *366court, in that said Bailey “is holding himself out as an attorney at law, by' advertisement and otherwise, and is practicing the profession of an attorney and counselor at law in courts of record in the said town and county, without having first been admitted so to do by this court.” Upon this accusation, which was supported in detail by the affidavit of F. J. Matoushek, Herbert H. Hoar and Carl L. Brattin, all…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Savings Bank v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. In Re DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. People ex rel. Colorado Bar Ass'n v. ErbaughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Darwin Charles BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. In Re the Disbarment of BaileyArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  3. In Re Contempt Proceedings of BrainardIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  4. In Re ScottNevada Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Bump v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API