In Re Contempt Proceedings of Brainard
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWernette, J.
These proceedings were instituted by direction of the board of bar commissioners of the state of Idaho, for the purpose of securing an order requiring E. C. S. Brainard to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt of court in that he for several years last past had been practicing law and holding himself out as qualified to practice law in the state, without having been admitted to practice by the Supreme Court of the state of Idaho, and without paying the license fees now prescribed by law for the practice of law.
Defendant Brainard filed an answer to the petition and affidavit,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Contempt Proceedings of Eastern Idaho Loan & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Abrams v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Airy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Newman v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
- State v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Grand Rapids Bar Ass'n v. DenkemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Batt v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Bump v. District Court of Polk CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Baker v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.