Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Turner & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

One of the nonsubstantive problems especially inherent in a multi-Judge and multi-part court system that has arisen as a result of the recent enactment of the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation Law (Insurance Law, art. 17-A) is the matter of processing of proposed orders of the court denying or granting applications for stays of arbitration proceedings after judicial hearings on preliminary issues. *1098That problem has arisen in the case at bar. In resolving it, I have decided tó express my views formally — as a guide to counsel in future MVAIC cases that may come before me.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Coughlin & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In re the Arbitration between Klein & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Gonzalez & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In re the Arbitration between Frame & American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & WinterNew York Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API