Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Gonzalez & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

This is a proceeding arising out of an accident in which the infant claimant was injured by an automobile owned by one Ortiz and operated by one Diaz. The claimants — entitled by the respondent (which instituted this proceeding) as petitioners — served a notice of arbitration upon the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation, which entitled itself herein as the respondent (but, see, Matter of Graffagnino v. MVAIC, 48 Misc 2d 441; Matter of Klein v. MVAIC, 48 Misc 2d 82, 83). The respondent by this proceeding applied at Special Term for Motions for an order staying arbitration…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Buck Ex Rel. Faulkner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. In re the Arbitration between Berman & Travelers Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In re the Arbitration between Graffagnino & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. In re the Arbitration between Klein & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. In re the Arbitration between Lowe & Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. L. H. Feder Corp. v. BozkurtianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Indiana Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. KinerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Bobby Bowen, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2013
  4. Garcia v. Travelers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API