Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Klein & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The respondent Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation moves for an order staying arbitration in an alleged ‘1 hit and run ’ ’ incident, or in the alternative, directing a trial of unresolved issues of fact presented as conditions precedent to arbitration.

The moving and answering papers are somewhat confusing, not alone when read together, but each on its own, and there is not presented a sequential statement of fact upon which I can depend. No notice or proof of claim is submitted; nor any copy of report to or from the Police Department or Motor Vehicle Department. No demand for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Coughlin & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In re the Arbitration between Graffagnino & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In re the Arbitration Between Marcus & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Gonzalez & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In re the Arbitration between Turner & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In re the Arbitration between Frame & American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  4. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & WinterNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Spiro PanagatosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API