Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Coughlin & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1965PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a motion by the respondent for an order staying arbitration noticed by infant claimants for failure to comply with CPLR 1209, and also on the ground that ¡the demand for arbitration was defective in that it did not set forth the amounts sought by each of the two claimants.
In respect of the latter objection, conceded by the claimants to be valid, the respondent has consented that leave be given to file a substitute demand to correct the omission, in view of the fact that the amounts indicated in the proposed amended demand are within the arbitrable limits of the MVAIC endorsement on…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Klein & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the Arbitration between Turner & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- In re the Arbitration between Frame & American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & JonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re the Arbitration Between Prinze & JonasNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.