In Re Service Corporation Intern.
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relators in this original mandamus proceeding are the four defendants in both a federal court class action involving only federal law claims and a state court action involving only state law claims. Both actions raise similar but not identical factual allegations of securities fraud in a merger transaction. The two plaintiffs in the state court action are members of the class in federal court. At least one of the plaintiffs in state court is bound by an arbitration agreement covering all his claims, state and federal, but almost all of the other members of the class in federal court are not.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prudential Securities Inc. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- EZ Pawn Corp. v. ManciasTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Bruce Terminix Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Emily DistajoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re D. Wilson Const. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re AIU Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Vesta Insurance Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.