Legal Opinion

Washington, Marlboro & Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 13, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 2831-49PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Nature of Case

This is an appeal by the Washington, Marlboro and Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc., hereinafter called W. M. & A., from the orders of the Public Utilities Commission of the District of Columbia, hereinafter called the Commission, in proceedings designated as P.U.C. No. 3489, Formal Case No. 383. The subject matter of the proceedings and orders is “bus -service of the Capital Transit Company is South East Washington, District of Columbia,” as here^ *322inafter more specifically set forth. By application and order of this Court pursuant thereto Capital Transit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Civil Aeronautics Board v. State Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Clarksburg-Columbus Short Route Bridge Co. v. WoodringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Watergate Improvement Associates v. Public Service CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Washington, Marlboro & Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
  3. Washington, Marlboro & Annapolis Motor Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
  4. Honeywell, Inc. v. Trico Sheet Metal, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API