Legal Opinion
Civil Aeronautics Board v. State Airlines, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 6, 1950No. 157PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
Acting under the Civil Aeronautics Act of 1938,1 the Civil Aeronautics Board (C. A. B.) consolidated some 45 route applications of 25 airlines into one area proceeding, styled the “Southeastern States Case.” After hearings, it made findings of fact as to what new routes should be established and which of the applicants could best serve these routes. It then entered orders authorizing certifi*574cates of convenience and necessity for several new routes in the area. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., was authorized to engage in air transportation of persons, property, and mail along certain of these routes.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Bros. Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
3Cited by45 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Brookline v. COMM. OF THE DEPT. OF ENVTL QUALITY ENG'GMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Florida Economic Advisory Council v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, Titusville-Cocoa Airport Authority, Huntsville-Madison Airport Authority, United Air Lines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.