Legal Opinion
Honeywell, Inc. v. Trico Sheet Metal, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 5, 1969Published
1Opinion of the CourtJohn T. Casey, J.
In this action the plaintiff, subcontractor, seeks to recover a balance allegedly due from its contractor, the defendant Trico Sheet Metal, Inc. and the contractor’s surety, the defendant Peerless Insurance Company.
The defendant Trico contracted with the State of New York to make certain improvements on a public building and subcontracted certain of the work (furnishing and installation of a pneumatic system of automatic temperature control) to the plaintiff. The defendant Peerless Insurance Company, as the surety on the defendant Trico’s payment bond pursuant to section 137 of the State…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chittenden Lumber Co. v. Silberblatt & Lasker, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Triple Cities Construction Co. v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Triple Cities Constr. Co. v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- United States Ex Rel. Harrington v. TrioneDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1951
- United States Ex Rel. Jonathan Handy Co. v. Deschenes Construction Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.