Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life Insurance

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 15, 1937No. 257PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*220Mr. Justice Brandéis

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Since 1921, the Revenue Acts have made this provision for taxing the income of life insurance companies.1 The gross income is limited to that “received during the taxable year from interest, dividends, and rents.” Upon the net income, ascertained by making prescribed deductions, the tax under the Act here applicable is 12 per cent.2 The general provisions of the Revenue Acts concerning capital “gains and losses” and “bad debts” are not applicable to life insurance companies.3

In 1930, the Midland Mutual Life Insurance Company of Ohio…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Old Colony Railroad v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Spring City Foundry Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Helvering v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Rutkin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Helvering v. HammelSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API