Legal Opinion

City of Muskegon v. Hanes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1907No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sessions, J. Mary A. Hanes was convicted of peddling without a license, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 or in default thereof to 30 days’ imprisonment in the county jail.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.

We adopt the opinion of the learned trial judge — Judge Sessions — rendered in disposing of this case in the circuit court. That opinion reads as follows :

“By stipulation in open court a jury was waived by the defendant and -the case submitted to the court for determination.
“ The facts in this case are undisputed. It appears from the evidence that the Raydith Manufacturing Company on the first day of last July was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, and manufacturing perfumes in the city of Chicago in that State; that the defendant was in the employ of that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. People v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Muskegon v. ZeerypMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. BunkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Newport v. French Bros. Bauer Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Despres, Bridges & Noel v. ZierleynMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Allport v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. American Distributing Co. v. Hayes Wheel Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1918
  5. People v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API