Legal Opinion

People v. Stewart

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1911No. Docket No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Berrien; David J. Stewart was convicted of selling goods by sample without a license.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case is before this court upon exceptions after conviction and before sentence. The case originated in justice’s court. The charge against the respondent, dated the 8th day of November, 1909, was that theretofore, to wit, on the 1st day of August, 1909, at the county of Berrien, and for ten days preceding that date, one David J. Stewart did travel from place to place within the county of Berrien, State of Michigan, for the purpose of taking orders for the purchase of goods, wares, and merchandise, by sample lists and catalogues, without having then and there obtained a license as a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. People v. SawyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. City of Muskegon v. ZeerypMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. BunkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. QuiderMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rath Packing Co. v. General Cold Storage Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Western Oil Refining Co. v. DaltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. People v. DenewethMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. DenewethMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API