American Distributing Co. v. Hayes Wheel Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
At Raw. Assumpsit by the American Distributing Company, a corporation, against the Hayes Wheel Company, a corporation. There was a verdict for plaintiff, and defendant moves for judgment non obstante veredicto.
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on a motion by defendant for a judgment non obstante veredicto. The action is assumpsit for the recovery of damages claimed to have been sustained by the plaintiff by reason of the repudiation by defendant of a written contract between plaintiff and defendant, providing for the appointment of the former as the selling agent of the latter’ and fixing the terms of such employment. Defendant is a Michigan cor*110poration, engaged in the manufacture 'of automobile wheels in the city of Jackson, Mich., where it has its factory. The plaintiff is…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wyles v. CampbellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- Marrinan Medical Supply, Inc. v. Ft. Dodge Serum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Robertson v. GarvanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- American Can Co. v. GarnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
- Hayes Wheel Co. v. American Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919