Legal Opinion
Application of Vincent J. Frilette and Paul B. Weisz
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1969No. Patent Appeal 8157PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Frilette and Weisz appeal from the Patent Office Board of Appeals decision affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 166-170, 173, 174, 187, 188, 191, and 193-198 of their application 1 as unpatentable over Plank ’249 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) or at least 35 U.S.C. § 103, or on the ground of double patent ing in view of the claims of Plank ’253, 3 assigned to appellants’ assignee.
THE INVENTION
The invention relates to porous, crystalline aluminosilicates, sometimes referred to as “molecular sieves,” which have particular value in the catalytic cracking of hydrocarbon oils.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Application of Max O. RobesonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Application of Edwin H. Land and Howard G. RogersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Application of Saul KayeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- In re SiuCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Paolo LongiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Derek Anthony Costello and Robert McCleanCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Application of Russell B. NewtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In re BassCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973