Legal Opinion

Jennie McCormack v. Mark Hiedeman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2012No. 11-36010, 11-36015PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

On May 18, 2011, Mark Hiedeman, the Bannock County, Idaho prosecuting attorney, filed a felony criminal complaint in the district court of the State of Idaho, in and for Bannock County against Jennie Linn McCormack. The complaint charged McCormack with “the public offense of Unlawful Abortion, Idaho Code § 18-606,” which makes it a felony for any woman to undergo an abortion in a manner not authorized by statute. As a result, McCormack faced the possibility of up to five years imprisonment for allegedly violating Idaho Code § 18-606, which specifically targets…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Xochitl Hernandez v. Jefferson SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. Arizona Dream Act Coalition v. Janice BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Feminist Majority Foundation v. Richard HurleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
  4. Faour Fraihat v. US Imm. & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. Jennie McCormack v. Stephen HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API