Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Palacios

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 13, 1991No. ACMR 8902789PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAVELLE, Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, Sergeant Palacios was found guilty by a general court-martial consisting of officer members of sodomy with a child under sixteen and committing indecent acts, in violation of Articles 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 925 and 934 (1982). The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence consisting of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twelve years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to Private E1.

Sergeant Palacios raises four issues.1 All relate to the correctness of the military…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. PalaciosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. MartindaleU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. ValdezU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. UretaUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  5. United States v. GardinierArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API