Legal Opinion

United States v. Gardinier

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 31, 2006No. ARMY 20020427PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*532OPINION OF THE COURT

SCHENCK, Senior Judge:

A military judge sitting as a general court-martial convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of indecent acts with a child under sixteen years of age and indecent liberties with a child under sixteen years of age, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for three years, and reduction to Private El. This case is before the court for review under Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866.

In their original…

2Cases cited87 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. GardinierCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  3. State v. RealCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. United States v. Sergeant JOHN R. WILLIAMSON, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007
  5. State of Arizona v. Rafael RealCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API