Camelot Group, Ltd. v. W. A. Krueger Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Defendant and cross-claimant, W. A. Krueger Co. (“Krueger”), seeks an order, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37, overruling the claims by Sidney Pal and Michael Bash, additional defendants on Krueger’s cross-claims (the “defendants”), of their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination asserted during the course of discovery proceedings, and directing them to answer questions propounded at their oral depositions, to answer interrogatories and to produce documents.
This action was commenced by the Camelot Group, formerly known as MBA Enterprises (“MBA”)…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn LoebDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- E. F. Hutton & Co. v. Jupiter Development Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.