Legal Opinion

First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Schamanek

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1984No. 17910PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

In this case, the trial court struck the defendant’s answer for failure to respond to requests for discovery and entered a default judgment against the defendant for $6,122.79 plus interest and costs. The defendant’s refusal to respond to deposition questions, requests for admissions and a demand for production of certain documents, including income tax returns, was based on her assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination. We affirm the trial court.

*1261I.

On August 8, 1980, Gail Schamanek entered First Federal and presented a cashier’s check for $6,122.79. Pursuant to…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API