First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Schamanek
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
In this case, the trial court struck the defendant’s answer for failure to respond to requests for discovery and entered a default judgment against the defendant for $6,122.79 plus interest and costs. The defendant’s refusal to respond to deposition questions, requests for admissions and a demand for production of certain documents, including income tax returns, was based on her assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination. We affirm the trial court.
*1261I.
On August 8, 1980, Gail Schamanek entered First Federal and presented a cashier’s check for $6,122.79. Pursuant to…
2Cases cited76 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchettlerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- In re Criminal Investigation, 7th District Court No. CS-1Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Kilpatrick v. Bullough Abatement, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
- R & R Energies v. Mother Earth Industries, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Morton v. Continental Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.