Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. Parker

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 11, 2007No. 06-415Published

1ConcurrenceRobert L. Brown, Justice

The decision to-day arguably reaches a grossly unfair result by saddling a person with a past-due support debt when that person has never claimed to be the father of the child and when he has been found, after paternity tests, not to be the biological father. Two previous cases are cited as authority for this conclusion. See Littles v. Flemings, 333 Ark. 476, 970 S.W.2d 259 (1998) (statute only allows relief from back child support for non-father if he had physical custody of the child); State v. Phillippe, 323 Ark. 434, 914 S.W.2d 752 (1996) (proven non-father married to the mother could not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walter v. GunterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Southern Telephone Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  3. Littles v. FlemingsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Stewart v. CombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API