Legal Opinion

Dick v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 17, 2005No. CR 04-1391PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Chief Justice.

Teresa Michelle Dick appeals her conviction for first-degree false imprisonment alleging that there is insufficient evidence to prove that she restrained her daughter without consent and lawful authority. Specifically, she argues that her conviction cannot stand because a parent cannot be criminally liable for restraining his or her child. We disagree and affirm.

Standard of Review

Dick asserts a single issue on appeal, that the circuit court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict on the false-imprisonment charge. We treat a motion for a directed verdict as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pender v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Attwood v. Estate of AttwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. State v. KinchenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. CombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  4. State Office of Child Support Enforcement v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Stewart v. CombsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API