Legal Opinion

Littles v. Flemings

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 11, 1998No. 97-1099PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

We must decide in this case whether one who has been adjudicated to be the father of a child is entitled to relief from future child-support obligations if scientific testing proves that he is not the child’s biological father. We hold that he is. We also hold, however, that in the circumstances presented he is not entitled to relief from his obligation for support already accrued.

Gina Felicia Flemings (now Foster), the appellee, sued Darryl A. Littles, the appellant, alleging that he was the father of her infant daughter. The Chancellor ordered a blood test for which…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chism v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  2. Arkansas Rural Medical Practice Student Loan & Scholarship Board v. LuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  3. Leathers v. CottonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Steele v. GannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Gentry v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bean v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. STATE, OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Martin v. PierceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Deaver v. Faucon Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API