Legal Opinion

Walter v. Gunter

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 9, 2002No. 41, Sept.Term, 2001PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATTAGLIA, Judge.

The decisional issue in this case is whether the appellant, Nicholas Todd Walter, remains liable for child support arrearages when the paternity judgment, from which the child support order emanates, was vacated. We hold that the putative father cannot be legally obligated for child support arrearages that result from a now-vacated paternity judgment. The trial court is without discretion in this matter because, as a matter of law, the inherently dependent child support orders are invalid upon the vacatur of the paternity declaration.

I. Background

On August 13, 1993, the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Werbowsky v. CollombCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Langston v. RiffeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. Riverdale Heights Volunteer Fire Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Knill v. KnillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  5. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. Nesbit v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Schisler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Harvey v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Chow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. 100 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Columbia Town Center Title Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API