Legal Opinion

Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Roff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 18, 1912No. 2053PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Coal County Court; R. H. Wells, Judge. Action by the Spaulding Manufacturing Company against A. V. Roff, R. E. Calloway, and J. F. Floyd. From a judgment of the county court dismissing an appeal from a justice of the peace, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This appeal is from the action of the county court in dismissing an appeal therein pending from a justice of the peace. The appeal was dismissed because of irregularities in the appeal bond. The bond, caption omitted, follows:

“Know all men by these presents, that the Spaulding Manufacturing Company as principal and Paul Mayer and A. R. Whitt as sureties are held and firmly bound unto A. V. Roff, R. E. Calloway, and J. F. Floyd in the sum of $50.00, for the payment of which well and truly to be made we do bind ourselves, our heirs, executors and administrators firmly by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haas v. LeesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Vowell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Washburn v. DelaneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Lovitt v. Wellington & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Federal Discount Co. v. ClowdusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Harper v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Roberts v. ConverseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. WitterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API