Legal Opinion
Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Witter
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 1912No. 2054PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error from Coal County Court; R. H. Wells, Judge. Action by the Spaulding Manufacturing Company against C. M. Witter, D. A. Wooly, and J. C. Thomas. From a judgment refusing to permit plaintiff to amend his petition, and refusing to permit him to amend an appeal bond and dismissing appeal, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROSSER, C.
The record, in this- case is, in all respects, identical with the record in Spaulding Manufacturing Co. v. Roff et al., ante, 125 Pac. 727, by Brewer, C., except as to the name of the defendants. Upon the authority of that case, this case must be reversed and remanded for further proceedings, not inconsistent with the opinion in that case.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roberts v. ConverseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Churchman v. PayteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Elledge v. ArterberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Sadler v. LeachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922