Legal Opinion
Paul v. Wadler
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 1962No. Civ. 20592PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, P. J.
In this appeal from an order denying the appellants’ motion for dissolution and modification of a temporary restraining order and granting the respondent, Director of Agriculture of the State of California, a preliminary injunction restraining the appellants from selling fluid milk below the minimum established price, it is argued that: (1) the basic statute (Agr. Code, § 4212) on which the temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction were based is unconstitutional; (2) the preliminary injunction was improperly issued, as section 4361 of the Agricultural Code is also…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. TorrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Ray v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Pacific Coast Dairy v. Police CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- R. I. Turnpike & Bridge Authority v. CohenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
- California Ass'n of Dispensing Opticians v. Pearle Vision Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- California State University v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Short Stop, Inc. v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.