Walker Ex Rel. Walker v. Byrd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
The duty which a motorist in this jurisdiction owes to children whom he sees, or in the exercise of proper care should see, on or near the highway, has been too often stated to need further elaboration here. For the purpose of this appeal we must, of course, accept the plaintiff’s evidence as true. High v. R.R., 248 N.C. 414, 103 S.E. 2d 498. Therefore, when the defendant saw the children apparently intending to cross the street but waiting on the car going west to pass, he could not assume that they would also wait on him. It becomes his duty “to use proper care with respect to speed and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sparks v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- High v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wainwright v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- GUPTON BY GUPTON v. McCombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Bray v. DailCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Thomas v. NewmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Misenheimer ex rel. Misenheimer v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962