Legal Opinion

Misenheimer ex rel. Misenheimer v. Carter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 21, 1962Published

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

Was the evidence sufficient to present a jury question? Stated in the alternative, was the evidence so deficient in probative value as to require the court, as a matter of law, to hold that a legitimate inference of defendant’s actionable negligence is not permissible? Lake v. Express Co., 249 N.C. 410, 106 S.E. 2d 518; Ward v. Smith, 223 N.C. 141, 25 S.E. 2d 463.

The collision occurred as the defendant drove north on the old Salisbury road. Michael Eddins, age 9, riding a bicycle, entered the road from a private driveway. The plaintiff, Charles Lee (Chuck) Misen-heimer, was behind Michael on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ward v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Greene v. Mitchell County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Murray v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Simmons v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Cassetta Ex Rel. Cassetta v. ComptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API