Legal Opinion

Bray v. Dail

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1974No. 738SC790PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether, when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the evidence is sufficient for submission to the jury. Kelly v. International Harvester Company, 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396 (1971); Sink v. Sink, 11 N.C. App. 549, 181 S.E. 2d 721 (1971).

In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury, all evidence which supports plaintiff’s claim must be taken as true and considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, giving him the benefit of every reasonable inference which may be legitimately drawn…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Hughes v. . ThayerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Sparks v. . WillisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. Wainwright v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Adams v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oliver Ex Rel. Oliver v. RoyallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Lewis ex rel. Lewis v. DoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Lyvere v. Ingles Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API