Legal Opinion

Marriage of March v. Crockarell

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 14, 1984No. C8-83-1881, C4-84-57 and C9-84-233PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Presiding Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment and the denial of a motion for amended findings or a new trial.

FACTS

Laurel and James Crockarell were married in 1975. They have two children, 7 and 4. Appellant, Laurel Ann March, 37, a licensed attorney, is a self-employed real estate broker and property manager. Respondent, James L. Crockarell, 40, is also a self-employed real estate broker-property manager.

After three years of marriage, both parties quit their salaried jobs to go into business together buying, selling and managing property.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Kaiser v. KaiserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Ruzic v. RuzicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Borchert v. BorchertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. Kucera v. KuceraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marriage of Nardini v. NardiniCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Ramsey County v. CrockarellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API