Legal Opinion

Ramsey County v. Crockarell

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 31, 2001No. C2-01-94PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge

On appeal after remand in a contempt proceeding for failure to pay child-support arrearages, appellant alleges the district court erred by (1) drawing negative inferences from appellant’s assertion of his Fifth Amendment rights, (2) finding appellant has access to assets which could be used to pay his obligations and meet the purge conditions, and (3) finding appellant in contempt without a court-ordered written payment plan. Because we conclude that the district court did not err, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant James Crockarell and respondent Laurel Ann March were married…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Hopp v. HoppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Marriage of Erickson v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Baken Park, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API