Weierke v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
John Paul Weierke, appealing from a trial court order sustaining the revocation of his driver’s license, challenges the lawfulness of the Intoxilyzer test of a sample that exceeded the minimum adequate sample. We affirm.
FACTS
After his arrest for DWI in June 1997, appellant submitted to an Intoxilyzer test and gave two adequate breath samples producing readings of .132, .136, .134, and .135 and a reported value of .13 with a 99% breath correlation. Based on this test result, the commissioner of public safety revoked appellant’s driver’s license.
At the revocation hearing,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Dehn v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Berge v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. RaderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Axelberg v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.