Legal Opinion

Dehn v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1986No. C1-86-845PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant was arrested for driving while under the influence. She submitted to a breath test which disclosed an alcohol concentration of .17. After an implied consent hearing, the trial court sustained the revocation of appellant’s driving privileges. Appellant appeals from the trial court’s order. We affirm.

FACTS

On July 23, 1985, Officer John Brought-en arrested appellant for driving while under the influence. He took her to the sheriff’s department in Waseca, where he read the implied consent advisory to her. The reading and subsequent discussion were videotaped. After…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durfee v. Rod Baxter Imports, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Hallock v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Connor v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Haase v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Brooks v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. Weierke v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. Busch v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Ellingson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API