Legal Opinion

Martin v. Lavender Radio & Supply, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 21, 1957No. 5-1347PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carleton Harris, Cliief Justice.

This appeal is rather unusual, in that Howell L. Martin, appellant, who was awarded compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation law, (because of a finding that he was injured in the course of his employment) is endeavoring to establish that he was not injured during the course of his employment, and is accordingly not covered under the Compensation Act. The facts are as follows: Hardware Mutual Casualty Company had issued a workmen’s compensation insurance policy to Lavender Radio and Supply Co., Inc., (hereinafter called Lavender) employer of Martin. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Hunter v. SummervilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Frank Lyon Co. v. OatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Bales, Admx. v. Service Club No. 1, Camp ChaffeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
  5. Mechanics Lumber Co. v. RoarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. First Camden National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Eagle Star Insurance Company, Ltd. v. Jo C. DealCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  3. James Q. Bryan and Gratha Bryan v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  4. Brooks v. WageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Ark. Power & Light Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API