Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael David Casey, United States of America v. Michael David Casey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 10, 2006No. 04-30525, 05-30016PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.
We must decide whether the United States is entitled to a money judgment forfeiture order against a criminal defendant who was convicted of a drug crime but had no assets at the time of sentencing.
I
In late 2001, two men agreed to purchase 1,000 tablets of 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), a controlled substance commonly referred to as “ecstasy,” from Michael Casey. 21 C.F.R. § 1308.11(d)(ll) (2005). The buyers wired $7,000 directly into Casey’s bank account, and he in turn sent the illicit drugs across state lines from California to Oregon in two separate…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Steven Douglas DareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Vampire Nation A/K/A Fredrik Von Hamilton A/K/A Frederick Hamilton Banks, Frederick H. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. DayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Mark PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.