Legal Opinion
United States v. Matthew Eugene Dupas
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 16, 2005No. 04-50055PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 3, 2005, slip opinion at 9059, and appearing at 417 F.3d 1064 (9th Cir.2005), is amended as follows:
On slip opinion page 9066 n. 3, appearing at 417 F.3d at 1068 n. 3, 2005 WL 1845503, at *3 n. 3, change “The Ex Post Facto Clause of the Fifth Amendment,” to “The Ex Post Facto Clause of Article I, Section 9,”.
On slip opinion page 9069 n. 5, appearing at 417 F.3d at 1069 n. 5, 2005 WL 1845503, at *4 n. 5, replace footnote 5 with the following:
Defendant raises two arguments about the procedure that the district court must follow in the event…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Derek A. Vaughn, Zaza Leslie LindoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Zameer Nooralla Mohamed, AKA Al, AKA Samier Hussain, AKA Zameer MohamedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.