Legal Opinion

Glancy v. City of Roseville

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1998No. Docket Nos. 106283, 109241, Calendar Nos. 1-2PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

These cases present the issue whether the second sentence of MCL 691.1407(1); MSA 3.996(107)(1), which affirms governmental immunity as it existed before July 1, 1965, codified the “two-inch rule”1 regarding municipal liability for sidewalk defects despite this Court’s abolition of the two-inch rule in Rule v Bay City, 387 Mich 281; 195 NW2d 849 (1972). Because the two-inch rule is a negligence rule rather than a principle of governmental immunity, we hold that subsection 7(1) could not reinstate the two-inch rule. Regarding defendants’ alternative contention that this Court should adopt the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. in Re Bradley EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Maskery v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API