Glancy v. City of Roseville
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
These cases present the issue whether the second sentence of MCL 691.1407(1); MSA 3.996(107)(1), which affirms governmental immunity as it existed before July 1, 1965, codified the “two-inch rule”1 regarding municipal liability for sidewalk defects despite this Court’s abolition of the two-inch rule in Rule v Bay City, 387 Mich 281; 195 NW2d 849 (1972). Because the two-inch rule is a negligence rule rather than a principle of governmental immunity, we hold that subsection 7(1) could not reinstate the two-inch rule. Regarding defendants’ alternative contention that this Court should adopt the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- O'Donnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Odom v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Robinson v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- in Re Bradley EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Haliw v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Maskery v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.