State Ex Rel. Topeka Police Department v. $895.00 U.S. Currency
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
The question we must resolve arises under the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act (KSASFA), K.S.A. 60-41.01 et seq. The State began civil forfeiture proceedings after seizing $895 in U.S. Currency and 3.15 grams of cocaine during the criminal arrest of Maurice Wright. In this proceeding, the State Board of Indigents’ Defense Services (BIDS) responded by filing a claim for present and anticipated attorney fees in Wright’s criminal case. BIDS appeals from an order striking its claim based upon the district court’s conclusion that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand, Etc., United States of America v. Three Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- In Re the Estate of StraderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
- State v. ZeitCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Zoellner v. CIVIL SERV. BD. OF LEAVENWORTH CTY.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Kansas Highway Patrol v. One 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Classic/Impala SS VIN 31G1BL52P8SR191732Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.