Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Topeka Police Department v. $895.00 U.S. Currency

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 5, 2006No. 94,719PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

The question we must resolve arises under the Kansas Standard Asset Seizure and Forfeiture Act (KSASFA), K.S.A. 60-41.01 et seq. The State began civil forfeiture proceedings after seizing $895 in U.S. Currency and 3.15 grams of cocaine during the criminal arrest of Maurice Wright. In this proceeding, the State Board of Indigents’ Defense Services (BIDS) responded by filing a claim for present and anticipated attorney fees in Wright’s criminal case. BIDS appeals from an order striking its claim based upon the district court’s conclusion that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. MonsantoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. United States v. Four Million, Two Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand, Etc., United States of America v. Three Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Six Thousand, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. In Re the Estate of StraderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. State v. ZeitCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  4. Zoellner v. CIVIL SERV. BD. OF LEAVENWORTH CTY.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. State Ex Rel. Kansas Highway Patrol v. One 1995 Chevrolet Caprice Classic/Impala SS VIN 31G1BL52P8SR191732Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API