Legal Opinion

State v. Zeit

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided April 4, 2008No. 98,192PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Leben, J.:

Kansans who operate vehicles on the roadways of Kansas must register them with the division of motor vehicles. But self-propelled cranes — defined by statute as cranes where an operator controls them from a permanent housing or module on the crane and the crane is not used to transport other property — are exempt from this requirement. An employee of Midwest Crane & Rigging, Kirk Zeit, was convicted of a misdemeanor for operating one of the company’s cranes on a roadway when it was not registered. We must set aside this conviction because the vehicle at issue meets the statutory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. RupnickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State Ex Rel. Topeka Police Department v. $895.00 U.S. CurrencySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. BusseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. KnightSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. BoyerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API