Legal Opinion

Carvell v. Weaver

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1921No. Civ. No. 3909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Henry C. Gesford, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an action for damages for the conversion of a Ford automobile.

On October 25, 1915, under a conditional contract the plaintiff, W. S. Carvell, purchased from the assignors of defendant L. F. Weaver, an automobile for which Carvell agreed to pay the sum of $508.50. Of this sum $200 was paid at the date of the contract, and the balance, with interest upon its diminishing residuum, was to be paid at the rate of $35 per month. None of these monthly payments were made upon their due date, but when tendered were accepted by the vendor of the automobile. On the twenty-second day of April…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hilmer v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Banning v. MarleauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Nickerson v. Cal. Stage Co.California Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Hogue v. FanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Green v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  3. Teledyne Industries, Inc. v. Eon CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  4. Pope v. National Aero Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API