Green v. Burr
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
The defendant appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The action is to recover the value of the furniture and contents of a certain restaurant in the city of Los Angeles alleged to have been wrongfully converted by defendant. The defendant denies plaintiff’s title and justifies the taking, as sheriff, under a writ of attachment issued in a cause entitled G. C. de Garmo v. George F. Harvat, and alleges that the defendant in that action is the owner of the property in controversy.
The appellant ’Contends that the findings in favor of plaintiff as to the ownership of the property are…
2Cited by6 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- In Re ShortridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Carvell v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Winne v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. OrtizSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.