Legal Opinion

Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. Walsh

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 19, 1985No. C5-84-1217PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien brought by appellant Korsunsky Krank Erickson (hereinafter KKE) to recover for architectural services rendered in developing property owned in fee by the respondents (hereinafter the Walshes). The trial court concluded that KKE was entitled to enforce the lien against the Walshes’ interest in the property. The Court of Appeals reversed, 357 N.W.2d 144 (Minn.App.1984). Having granted KKE’s petition for further review, we reverse the Court of Appeals and reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

At all times material to this action,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Laird v. MoonanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Karl Krahl Excavating Co. v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  4. Dunham Associates, Inc. v. Group Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Berglund & Peterson v. AbramSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Riverview Muir Doran, LLC v. JADT Development Group, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. United States ex rel. Olson v. W.H. Cates Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. London Construction Co. v. Roseville Townhomes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  4. Christle v. MarbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Mid-America Steel, Inc. v. BjoneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API